Still a good possibility that it will be hot, but much less likely of a 2005 repeat when moved to October. Plus, the improvements they're making at the park will make the grounds much much better.
I pray it won't be as hot as it was in 2005! I don't live in the area, but from what I understand from folks who do, it'll likely still be pretty hot in October.
I think it's a great idea! Ya, it will most likely still be hot, but probably northern standard hot (85), rather than Austin hot (95). And you're right, the renovations in the park are going to make it SO much more enjoyable! Can't wait!
's report ecnludid the following (unreferenced) reference, on p.57:__Valentine, Tom (1987) “Magnetics may hold key to ozone layer problems,” Magnets, 2(1) 18-26.__Without even seeing the article, it is unclear how a 1987 article about ozone layer in an (offbeat, non-scholarly) technology journal could have *anything* to do with the purported investigation of 1998-1999 papers on temperature reconstructions.__AWFUL__It turns out (H/T Michael Tobis & Anna Haynes) that Tom Valentine has written about topics mentioned below, as well as psychic surgery. He was the editor of Magnets 1988-1991, a step up from his earlier writing for the National Tattler, but not a scholarly journal. He later ran a talk show that among other things promoted the dreaded black helicopters. pWhile Wegman, Scott, and Said did this pro bono, the salaries of everybody else involved in the House were paid for by US taxpayers and we got scholarship of this quality, because NAS was unlikely to address all of Mr. Barton's concerns. [DC: Dunno why, but I had to fish this out of the spam filter. ]
I find it curious that Dr Curry has spent so much time and erofft engaging with the skeptical blogs, but I find very little engagement from her in venues such as this. There was a recent drive-by post at realclimate that kicked up a stink, and then nothing. No engagement in the aftermath in that venue.It feels a bit one-sided to me. I got the impression originally she was trying to reach out and increase understanding provide a bridge between the science and those that have lost faith in the scientific process. Yet everything recently from her has been fairly vociferous criticism of scientists, the CRU investigations and the IPCC processes. I see none of the balance I would expect.
Not affiliated with C3, Austin City Limits, or Austin City Limits Festival. This is strictly for entertainment purposes. No accuracy is guaranteed by this forum and moderation is limited.
